Threat Intelligence

5 min read

War Room: CVE-2025-14847—Mongobleed explained

Learn all about CVE-2025-14847, the High Vulnerability MongoDB memory leak vulnerability allowing unauthenticated memory disclosure.

diskordia avatar

diskordia,
Jan 07
2026

Some vulnerabilities arrive quietly, get patched quietly, and disappear quietly. But it looks like CVE-2025-14847 did not get that particular memo.

Also known as Mongobleed, the MongoDB vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to read uninitialized memory directly from a running MongoDB server. No credentials. No valid session. Just raw memory exposure over the wire.

PLAY THE MANGOBLEED SHERLOCK

If that sounds a little familiar, it should. Mongobleed belongs in the same category as Heartbleed and Log4Shell: protocol-level flaws with outsized blast radius and very little forgiveness for slow response.

What is Mongobleed (CVE-2025-14847)?

Mongobleed is a memory disclosure vulnerability in MongoDB Server related to the way compressed network traffic is handled. MongoDB supports several compression algorithms for client-server communication, including zlib, which is enabled by default in most supported versions.

The issue crops up when MongoDB processes a specially crafted OP_COMPRESSED message. Because of improper initialization of memory buffers during zlib decompression, the server can return chunks of uninitialized process memory back to the client. It’s important to note that this happens before authentication.

And perhaps most importantly, attackers do not need valid credentials, a user account, or even a correctly formed MongoDB query. If the database is reachable, it can be exploited.

What data can be exposed through CVE-2025-14847?

Since Mongobleed leaks process memory as opposed to database records, the impact goes well beyond leaked collections. Exposed data may include:

  • Database usernames and passwords

  • Application secrets and API keys

  • Cloud provider credentials

  • Session tokens

  • Residual application data still present in memory

This is runtime data that security teams often assume never leaves RAM. Mongobleed breaks that assumption.

Which MongoDB versions have been affected?

MongoDB deployments using zlib compression are vulnerable in the following versions:

  • MongoDB 8.2.x before 8.2.3

  • MongoDB 8.0.x before 8.0.17

  • MongoDB 7.0.x before 7.0.28

  • MongoDB 6.0.x before 6.0.27

  • MongoDB 5.0.x before 5.0.32

  • MongoDB 4.4.x before 4.4.30

  • All MongoDB 4.2, 4.0, and 3.6 releases (end of life)

MongoDB Atlas clusters have been patched automatically. Self-managed environments remain the primary risk.

CVE-2025-14847: The exploit in the wild

The exploitation timeline was pretty aggressive—and not very festive at all:

  • December 12, 2025: Vulnerability identified

  • December 19, 2025: Public disclosure and patches released

  • December 26, 2025: Public proof-of-concept exploits published

  • December 29, 2025: Active exploitation confirmed

On December 29, 2025, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added CVE-2025-14847 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, confirming real‑world exploitation and elevating remediation from best practice to operational requirement.

Not long after PoC release, security teams observed widespread scanning activity targeting exposed MongoDB instances, primarily over port 27017. Exploitation called for minimal sophistication and was therefore easily automated.

At the time of disclosure, tens of thousands of MongoDB instances were still directly accessible over the internet.

What makes Mongobleed a dangerous vulnerability?

Mongobleed is not just another of your patch-and-move-on vulnerabilities. It combines several traits that make it disproportionately risky in real-world environments.

Unauthenticated Access

Any reachable MongoDB instance is a viable target. Internet exposure is the most obvious risk, but internal exposure matters just as much if an attacker gains a foothold elsewhere in the network.

Unlike many database vulnerabilities, there is no need to brute-force credentials or abuse misconfigurations. Network reachability is the only prerequisite.

Memory disclosure vs data theft

Traditional database breaches focus on extracting stored records. Mongobleed exposes process memory, which often contains:

  • Recently used credentials

  • Cloud access tokens

  • TLS material

  • Application secrets loaded at runtime

These artifacts frequently unlock additional systems. The database becomes a launch point, not the final target.

Low visibility built in

The vulnerability is triggered during pre-authentication protocol handling. In many environments, this activity blends into normal connection noise.

Standard MongoDB audit logs may show nothing useful. Detection depends far more on network telemetry than application-level logging.

How attackers are (probably) chaining Mongobleed

In observed campaigns, Mongobleed fits neatly into early-stage access and expansion workflows:

  1. Scan for exposed MongoDB instances

  2. Exploit CVE-2025-14847 to extract memory fragments

  3. Harvest secrets from leaked memory

  4. Pivot into cloud infrastructure, CI/CD systems, or internal services

This makes Mongobleed especially dangerous in cloud-native environments where credentials are short-lived but frequently refreshed in memory. The vulnerability doesn’t need persistence—just good timing.

Detection and threat hunting guidance

Because application logs offer limited insight, defenders should focus on network and behavioral indicators:

  • Unusual pre-auth MongoDB connections with compressed payloads

  • Repeated short-lived connections to port 27017

  • Compression negotiation anomalies

  • Unexpected outbound activity from database hosts following suspicious connections

Network flow data, IDS signatures, and east-west traffic monitoring provide far more value than database-level logging for this CVE.

Recommended mitigations for CVE-2025-14847

1. Patch Immediately

Upgrade MongoDB to a fixed version as soon as possible:

  • 8.2.3 or later

  • 8.0.17 or later

  • 7.0.28 or later

  • 6.0.27 or later

  • 5.0.32 or later

  • 4.4.30 or later

If you are running an end-of-life MongoDB version, there is no safe workaround.

2. Restrict network exposure

MongoDB should not be publicly accessible. Enforce strict firewall rules, private networking, and network segmentation yesterday.

3. Temporary risk reduction

If immediate patching isn’t possible, disable zlib compression:

net:

  compression:

    compressors: snappy,zstd

This mitigation limits exposure without having a huge impact on your performance.

4. Rotate credentials

If a vulnerable instance was exposed, rotate all associated secrets:

  • Database credentials

  • Application secrets

  • Cloud access keys

5. Monitor and hunt

Use network telemetry, IDS, and flow logs to identify unusual pre-authentication connection patterns targeting MongoDB services.

Final thoughts on Mongobleed

Mongobleed is a stark reminder that memory safety issues remain a critical risk in high-performance infrastructure going into 2026. Modern databases are fast, flexible, and so deeply embedded in cloud environments that when they leak memory, the impact spreads quickly.

If your MongoDB deployment was exposed and unpatched, assume compromise until proven otherwise. Patch fast, lock it down, rotate everything—and that’s how you stop the bleeding.

TRY OUR MANGOBLEED SHERLOCK

Hack The Blog

The latest news and updates, direct from Hack The Box